STATUS: ACTIVE
CLASSIFICATION: SECURITY REVIEW, IN CONVERSATION
When was the last time someone actually read your code for vulnerabilities?
Code Auditor is a security-focused chat persona inside the Aurvek webchat, built for developers who want a careful second read before code review. You paste code into the conversation; it answers with severity-tagged findings and suggested fixes, in plain chat text.
Code Auditor reads only the code you paste, and its findings are advisory. It works alongside your scanners, tests, and human reviewers — it does not replace them, and a clean read does not prove your code is safe.
What it is — a persona in a chat thread
THE SHORT VERSION
Code Auditor is a specialized chat persona that lives inside Aurvek's shared webchat. It is not an app, not a scanner you point at a repository, and not a dashboard — it is a conversation. The persona is tuned for security review: it reads the code you paste, asks what the code is and where it runs, and writes back findings tagged by severity, with suggested fixes you can copy.
You bring the context — language, framework, what the code is supposed to do — and it reads with an attacker's eye: inputs, trust boundaries, and quiet assumptions.
How a session works
Register or sign in to Aurvek
The persona opens as a normal chat thread inside your Aurvek account — nothing to install or configure.
Paste your code as text
A function, a class, an endpoint handler — Python, JavaScript, Java, Go, C#, Rust, PHP, or anything else you write. There is no file or image upload in this chat, so code goes in as pasted text.
Give it context
Language, framework, and what the code should do. Saying "this is a Django REST Framework serializer" instead of "this is a Flask route" changes what it looks for.
Read the findings
Each finding is tagged Critical, High, Medium, Low, or Info, with the risky snippet quoted, the risk explained in plain language, and a suggested fix.
Ask follow-ups, paste the next chunk
It keeps context within the conversation, so you can challenge a finding, ask why something is risky, or continue with the next piece of code.
Example conversation — demo
A shortened sample exchange to show the tone and format. Illustrative only — not a real user conversation.
Here's my Express.js authentication middleware. Can you check it for OWASP Top 10 issues? It handles JWT tokens and session management.
Audit this Python Flask endpoint for SQL injection. It processes user search queries against a PostgreSQL database.
I have a Go service that handles file uploads. Check it for path traversal and race conditions.
This React component uses dangerouslySetInnerHTML for user-generated content. How bad is it?
query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '{user_input}'"
cursor.execute(query)query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = %s"
cursor.execute(query, (user_input,))What it delivers — in chat text only
WHAT IT READS FOR — SEVERITY GUIDE
Injection Attacks
SQL, NoSQL, OS command, and template injection. If pasted code mixes user input with a query or command, it gets flagged.
Broken Authentication
Weak token handling, missing session expiry, hardcoded credentials, insecure password storage.
XSS & CSRF
Unescaped output, unsafe HTML rendering, missing CSRF tokens on state-changing routes.
Race Conditions
Time-of-check to time-of-use gaps and concurrent access without locks, when the pasted code shows them.
Performance Bottlenecks
N+1 query patterns, unbounded loops, unclosed resources — visible in the code you paste.
Best Practice Gaps
Deprecated APIs, missing error handling, exposed stack traces — defense-in-depth concerns.
Case note: everything arrives as ordinary chat text. Aurvek's generic conversation export can save the thread for your records; there are no formatted audit reports.
What it does not do — the honest ledger
WHAT IT'S GOOD AT
- Reading pasted code with an attacker's eye
- Flagging common vulnerability patterns, OWASP Top 10 and friends
- Explaining risk in plain language, not scanner jargon
- Showing a concrete suggested fix for each finding
- Answering follow-up questions in the context of the conversation
WHAT IT NEVER DOES
- Repositories or CI: it does not connect to repos, pipelines, or ticketing systems — you paste code into the chat yourself
- File or image uploads — there is no upload in this chat; paste text only
- Security guarantees — findings are advisory; a clean read is not proof of safety, and it is not a penetration test or a certified audit
- Replace scanners, tests, or human review — it works alongside them, not instead of them
- Formal reports or compliance documents — the output is a chat conversation
- Watching your code over time — it responds while you are chatting; what remains is your account's conversation history, nothing more
Access and cost
ACCESS
Code Auditor is open to any Aurvek account — there is no separate purchase and no subscription for the persona itself. Register, open the chat, and paste your first snippet.
COST
Chatting consumes your Aurvek wallet balance based on usage, so a short question costs less than a long review session. You can check your balance and current rates, and top up, from the wallet page in your Aurvek account.
One conditional capability: web search
If you enable web search in the chat settings, Code Auditor can look things up online while you talk — for example, checking a current CVE entry or a framework's security guidance. Treat anything found this way as a starting point, not a conclusion, and verify it against primary sources. The persona works without it: the core of the review is the code you paste.
Declassified: FAQ
No. Code Auditor is an AI chat persona — it is good at spotting common vulnerability patterns and explaining them, but it cannot replace a professional penetration test, a dedicated SAST/DAST setup, or human code review. Think of it as a knowledgeable second pair of eyes before your code goes to review, not as your entire security strategy.
A few hundred lines at a time works well — a single module, class, or endpoint handler. For larger codebases, break the code into logical units and review them in sequence. There is no file upload in this chat, so everything goes in as pasted text.
No. It does not connect to repositories, pipelines, or any external system — it only reads the code you paste into the conversation. A side effect of that: your code never leaves the chat for some separate scanning service.
Critical: likely exploitable now, with serious impact. High: a serious issue, exploitable with moderate effort. Medium: real risk under specific conditions. Low: minor issue or defense-in-depth concern. Info: a best-practice suggestion, not a direct vulnerability. These follow common security-review conventions and are the persona's judgment, not a certification.
Within one conversation it keeps full context. Your account keeps the conversation history, so you can scroll back or pick a thread up again — but when you start a new conversation, paste the relevant code again with a short recap rather than assuming it remembers.
Paste your code.
See what an attacker would notice.
Open a chat with Code Auditor, drop in the snippet you have been meaning to re-read, and get severity-tagged findings in plain text — then decide what deserves a fix, a test, or a human reviewer.
Start chattingNo payment is required to open this persona; conversation usage consumes your Aurvek wallet balance. Code Auditor is an AI assistant, not a certified auditor — findings carry no security guarantee.